States move quickly to change teacher evaluations: 33 and counting

How fast are states moving to change their teacher evaluation policies in the wake of a major, years-long reform push by the Obama administration and others?

Very fast, according to a report released today by the National Council on Teacher Quality (NCTQ).

The NCTQ, an advocacy group that applauds most of these changes, counted 33 states that have tweaked–if not overhauled–their teacher evaluation policies since 2009, when the Obama administration’s education reform grant competition, Race to the Top, was announced. The changes have ranged from new laws that permit a teacher to be fired based on student test scores to requirements that teachers be evaluated at least once a year. The NCTQ found that 24 states now include test scores in teacher evaluations, and 18 have evaluations “significantly” informed by student achievement.

Race to the Top prize money has driven some states to revamp classroom observations of teachers and design systems to rate teachers using student achievement data. But others are rewriting their policies in the absence of such financial incentives.

“I don’t think we’re going to get to 50 too quickly,” report author Sandi Jacobs said yesterday in a conference call with reporters hosted by the Education Writers Association. “But I do think we’re going to continue to see these numbers go up.”

While more states, including some Race to the Top winners, have promised to make changes to how teachers are rated, the report doesn’t count those that have yet to pass statewide laws or take other concrete actions.

Yesterday, The Hechinger Report published a story in collaboration with the American Prospect looking at how these changes are translating into millions of dollars in contracts for private companies and nonprofits.

But how will these new policies change what happens in classrooms? Will they lead to improved student achievement?

The response on the conference call yesterday was, essentially, we don’t know yet. Jane Hannaway, a vice president of the American Institutes for Research (which has won contracts to design value-added teacher evaluation systems in Florida and New York, and which is among the supporters of The Hechinger Report) said she is confident that the new systems will be better than what they’re replacing.

“The huge variation in teachers is something that’s just indisputable right now,” she said. “A big leap has been made.”


POSTED BY ON October 26, 2011

Comments & Trackbacks (3) | Post a Comment

Monty Neill

So millions of dollars in private contracts taken out of declining funds available for schools in the ‘hope’ that the results will be better than what we have now, even though so-called ‘value added ‘ (just another way to slice standardized test scores) is highly erratic and that use of test scores will only intensify the reduction of schooling to test prep and bring numerous other problems.

For counter-points to the value-added claims, see the letter to Congress on teacher evaluation from the Forum on Educational Accountability, at http://www.edaccountability.org/What_Should_Congress_Do_About_Teacher_Evaluation-_FEA_letter_9-20-11.pdf; FairTest’s analysis of “little value in the addition” at http://fairtest.org/student-test-scores-inaccurate-way-judge-teachers; and FairTest’s critique focused on Massachusetts at http://www.fairtest.org/flawed-ma-teacher-evaluation-proposal-report-home

Merelle Sage

I agree that the teacher evaluation systems that are in place need to have changes made to them. With that said, I do not agree that teachers should be evaluated primarily on the test scores of the students in which they teach, which is something I see happening. Test scores are a good indcator of student learning but there are so many factors that can positivley or negatively affect the outcome of the students taking these standardized tests that we can expect to place majoprity of a teachers success on the result sof these tests. Every action or interaction or best practices shpould be taken into account when evaluating a teachers ability to effectively educate the his or her students. If your going to evaluate then evaluate the whole and not just the speifics. In terms of student achievement, some students are excellent test takers and others are not. They may be able to use strategies to successfully pass the test yet still did not learn much that school year. Teachers are being forced to “teach to the test” instead of being provided adequate professional development. We need to train teachers effectively and it begins with improving and investing in adult education programs.

[...] teacher evaluation systems have been changed in at least 33 states since 2009, and more than two dozen are relying on both observations and student growth on test scores to [...]

Your email is never published nor shared.

Required
Required
CAPTCHA Image
*